Thursday, December 16, 2010

Specificity


"Tape the word 'SPECIFIC' to the top of your computer.
Specific details make the story become alive."
~ Dori Chaconas



While I was world building in my current MS, I thought, Yeah, that works. I can see it. The problem was, that I could see it because it was in my head. Others couldn't see it quite so clearly. I have spent draft after draft after draft working to beef up the visual details--specificity is key (and so is a good CP!).

Lynn Quitman Troyka developed the RENNS model to help keep writing more specific.  
RENNS stands for: 
  • Reasons 
  • Examples 
  • Names 
  • Numbers 
  • Senses (sight, sound, smell, taste, touch).
If we remember to include these items of specificity more often, our writing becomes more visual.

What technique do you use to help create stronger and more visual details in your writing?

28 comments:

  1. My technique? Overwriting. :D Then I go back and edit out the nonsense, keeping only what's most important/significant to the scene.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great reminder, Shannon! I love the RENNS acronym.

    If you get a chance, please swing by my blog - it's anonymous critique day!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great points! Yeah, I try to make sure I've used each sense at least once in every chapter. You'll be surprised how lacking 'touch' is in most books!!! I try to use more of that. It's amazing how that one sense can transform a scene!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is SO weird but I was just tweeting about how I cannot spell that word today for the life of me!

    ReplyDelete
  5. The first time through I just try to get the basics down. The next time through I start looking for ways to add specific details that bring the story to life. I like that acronym!

    ReplyDelete
  6. When I'm going through the first draft, I type down everything that comes to mind, every minute detail--I can always take away the superfluous words during editing, and it helps to get a better idea of how to describe what it is I'm writing about.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I also have that problem...seeing things clearly because they're in my head, but then it doesn't translate to the reader. These are great tips! Thanks! :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. RENNS... I like that. I usually give too much detail and then have to take a bunch out and then go back in and add more important details.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Oh, man, I need the RENNS on my computer. I'm not super specific on certain things. On others, I am, but yeah. I could really work on examples and names and numbers. Senses, I think, I have a grip on. Finally.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Details like that are my downfall. I have to go back and add them in (usually after a CP mentions how lacking my work is). :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Super points, Shannon. I try to stay away from To be. The verb doesn't translate well onto the printed page.

    Ohhhh, if only my head and the keyboard could connect!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. RENNS is brilliant!

    I am going to use it up -- and teach it, too!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I need to work on improving my description - I'll use some of these tips! :)

    ReplyDelete
  14. My rough drafts are usually bare bones, then I go back and add in more descriptions and settings. I add in specifics.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hmm, that's an interesting question. As a PB writer, I don't worry about it too much, because I feel that is mainly the job of the illustrator. I PURPOSELY leave a lot of details up to whoever is illustrating my book.

    ReplyDelete
  16. RENNS! So cool. =)I send it to my buddies to crit because I see it so much better in my head. =)

    ReplyDelete
  17. I fight the "white room" syndrome all the time! I love this list - I'm adding it to my revision checklist right now!!

    In addition to sight, sound, smell, taste, touch, you can add: time, temperature, pain, balance, motion, and direction.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This is great, Shannon. I'm working with one of my teen son's girl friends right now on her writing skills, and I'm going to steal this, if you don't mind. :)

    ReplyDelete
  19. I mostly just try to make sure I include different senses. I'll definitely have to work on the rest of the RENNS model! Thanks for sharing this with us.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I know I definitely need to work on using my senses even more with my wip!!!

    I've not heard of the RENNS model - thanks cos this makes sense!!!! Take care
    x

    ReplyDelete
  21. I think I'm heavy on the visual sense and need to remember the sounds and smells and feel of things more. It's amazing how more developed a story is by changing generic words for more specific ones, too. Instead of he approached the woods, he approached a stand of white aspens, makes a much more vivid picture.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Great advice! I love all the little details-not a lot, but just the right ones to really pain an image.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I'm totally going to use that acronym... Looks really helpful!

    ReplyDelete
  24. I like to use pictures and try to put myself in the scene. What would I see, feel, notice...smell. Hope its working. =)
    Edge of Your Seat Romance

    ReplyDelete
  25. I definitely lack some of this specificity in my writing. AND I know it. I just need to start paying attention when I write and consciously including the details :) Good post, thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Guilty. Sometimes I'm just bein' lazy. I can't decide what I want *it* to be (whether it's food or clothes or music) so I gloss over and come back later to bring it into sharper focus.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Hi Shannon -

    I'm still trying to strike a balance between too many adjectives and not enough description. Thanks for the RENN model. :)

    Blessings,
    Susan

    ReplyDelete
  28. I've never heard of the RENNS acronym before, that will come in handy ;)

    I usually write a very skeletal first draft, then flesh it out in later versions.

    Rach

    ReplyDelete

Go ahead...make my day! Leave a comment. :)